Explore / 03 / Connected research
An answer opens
the next question.
Keep working from the evidence you already have. Question a claim, examine a gap, or take a promising thread somewhere new.
01Grounded follow-up questions
02Rabbit-hole investigations and dossiers
03Research inside products and agent workflows
THE DETAILS CHANGE THE CALL
The report is a starting point.
A source is disputed. An assumption changes. A new question emerges in the meeting. The useful part of research is being able to go back in and work out what that means.
Ask against the retained sources when the evidence is already there. Start a focused investigation when you need more. Keep both connected to the original work.
01 / THE QUESTION YOU BRING
Give the research
something to work with.
What still needs to be checked before this recommendation moves forward?
- THE STARTING POINT
- An existing recommendation and its retained sources
- THE QUESTION
- Which assumptions, disputed claims, or gaps need another look?
- THE HANDOFF
- A grounded answer or a focused new investigation
Illustrative brief. Bring your own context and constraints.
Start with the existing work
Identify the run and the conclusion or source passage you want to examine. A grounded question should make clear which part of the collected evidence it is asking about.
Separate reading from new research
Use a grounded follow-up to understand the retained sources. Start a focused investigation when the question needs new evidence beyond that material.
Set the next destination
Decide whether the result is for a human review, an application workflow, or an assistant. Choose the browser, REST API, or MCP accordingly.
02 / THE WORK FARSIDE DOES
Build the evidence.
Work the question.
- 01
Reopen the evidence
Read the retained report and source records. Find the specific claim, gap, or trade-off you need to understand.
- 02
Ask a grounded question
Use the collected sources to explore the existing research, keeping citations available to inspect.
- 03
Investigate a new thread
Take a promising rabbit hole into focused research when the answer requires more evidence.
- 04
Keep the work connected
Use related investigations and dossier documents to carry the context into the next decision or product workflow.
Pick up the thread.
RESEARCH STRUCTURE
Grounded follow-up answers
An answer against the collected sources, with citations that help you check its support.
Revisit the cited source behind a disputed recommendation
Which source supports this particular claim?
Document contents vary by research type and available evidence. Deep research and follow-on actions depend on plan access.
03 / THE NEXT USEFUL QUESTION
Take the useful questions further.
- 01Which source supports this particular claim?
- 02What evidence would change the conclusion?
- 03Does this gap need new research or a direct check?